View Single Post
  #6  
Unread 02-02-2018, 06:25 AM
w1cked w1cked is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPecsPeter View Post
It says it very clearly in the book that the numbers given are x LBM rather than total mass. This is quite early on. Why not actually READ the book instead of just turning to the recommendations page?

In terms of the difference being trivial if you're lean, this is IMO wrong when you're talking about multiples such as 1.5x.

Example: 190lbs guy at 12%. With a 1.5x multiplier, for bw vs LBM bases, you're looking at a difference of as much as 50g protein. That IS significant, both in terms of requirements and in costs
Shouldve spent more time in math class than 'how to be pedantic about minutae' class

190x.88=167x1.5=250

190×1.5=285

285-250=35...funny, this number doesn't look like 50

Yeah, he's gonna have to take out a 2nd mortgage to afford 35g protein

Clearly you're more enlightened than this guy too.

https://www.bodyrecomposition.com/nu...calories.html/

Last edited by w1cked : 02-02-2018 at 06:31 AM.