BodyRecomposition Support Forums  

Go Back   BodyRecomposition Support Forums > My products > Guide to Flexible Dieting
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Unread 07-09-2014, 08:02 PM
Primalkid Primalkid is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lylemcd View Post
In both of my books I recommend using estimated maintenance adjusted down by a little bit in the first place. To take this into account.
Yep, see that now upon reviewing them. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 07-10-2014, 06:32 AM
oval61251 oval61251 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 335
Default

Just curious, what are the body weight maintenance multipliers for women based on activity level? I found an article Lyle wrote for males, but cant find one for females I know its out there because I saw it.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 07-10-2014, 09:33 AM
alcahuetej's Avatar
alcahuetej alcahuetej is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 760
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by oval61251 View Post
Just curious, what are the body weight maintenance multipliers for women based on activity level? I found an article Lyle wrote for males, but cant find one for females I know its out there because I saw it.
For average activity level from the calculating maintenance article.

"In general, women or those with a ‘slower’ metabolic rate should use the lower value (14 cal/lb) and men or those with a ‘faster’ metabolic rate should use the higher value (16 cal/lb) as a STARTING POINT ESTIMATION for maintenance."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread 07-10-2014, 10:50 AM
oval61251 oval61251 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alcahuetej View Post
For average activity level from the calculating maintenance article.

"In general, women or those with a ‘slower’ metabolic rate should use the lower value (14 cal/lb) and men or those with a ‘faster’ metabolic rate should use the higher value (16 cal/lb) as a STARTING POINT ESTIMATION for maintenance."
Awesome, thanks! I thought I saw 12cal/lb somewhere.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.