BodyRecomposition Support Forums  

Go Back   BodyRecomposition Support Forums > General information > General training questions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 02-02-2018, 01:19 PM
GabrielPG GabrielPG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 5
Default Why are low volume/heavy weights routines recommended for hardgainers?

Aren't hardgainers more attuned to strength endurance rather than max efforts?

Wouldn't be a high rep mid volume program with a few heavy low rep sets sprinkled in between better?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 02-02-2018, 01:27 PM
LightCrow LightCrow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 982
Default

It all goes back to HIT philosophy that they have poor recovery, so need less volume to grow. Stuart McRobert is their Jedi Master. That's pretty old 90s training dogma though, not really what anyone with credibility is saying any more. Just do what Lyle says for bulking even if you are a hardgainer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 02-02-2018, 01:56 PM
zLeeKo's Avatar
zLeeKo zLeeKo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 753
Default

Actually, what Lyle recommended once was high volume and more food.

And what LightCrow said.
__________________
"He never had the makings of a varsity athlete"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 02-02-2018, 02:04 PM
LightCrow LightCrow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 982
Default

And to play pedantics, unless you're on 600mg a week aren't we all hardgainers?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 02-02-2018, 03:32 PM
w1cked w1cked is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,739
Default

Because they are productive. Even for non hardgainers.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 02-03-2018, 05:03 AM
zLeeKo's Avatar
zLeeKo zLeeKo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LightCrow View Post
And to play pedantics, unless you're on 600mg a week aren't we all hardgainers?
I think it's more accurate to say that most are 'normalgainers'. It's just that looking at easygainers/drug users skews people's ideas of what is normal or can be realistically expected. So they see some bozo claiming 20 lbs of muscle in 2 months (or hell 6 weeks if you're Christian Thibadeau) and try to mimick that. And just fat fat. And draw silly conclusions. Or going to very dumb training interpretations. Also, by the time you've decided you're an 'extreme hardgainer', you've already given up.

But the only silly thing is measuring yourself against drug users/lying hypocrites.

A lot of people fool themselves (at least for a certain time period) and think their muscular gains are bigger than they really are just because scale is going up and they are lifting heavier weights.

But you always have to consider (so you don't trick yourself):

- neural strength gains
- if training is optimized for growth
- if strength is increasing due to technique becoming worse?
-mistake fat for muscle (often happens for people moving up in the 13-17 BF% range...and then BAM when they move out that range they realize damn i was gaining more fat than i believed. 13-17% is in many cases a tricky BF range as it can 'hide' fat gains)
-if the diet is optimized for growth
-obesification gains (fat can drive up strength too)

P.S.
My secret point: Fat is key to happiness and strength.
__________________
"He never had the makings of a varsity athlete"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 02-03-2018, 07:34 AM
AlphaBettor AlphaBettor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 603
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GabrielPG View Post
Aren't hardgainers more attuned to strength endurance rather than max efforts?

Wouldn't be a high rep mid volume program with a few heavy low rep sets sprinkled in between better?
It never made much sense to me either. Not a big fan of the term hardgainer but I'm sure we all know what it means. If we look at some of the commonalities they have - often slight build/small joints, slow-twitch type, poor growth response - these are things that the low volume, high intensity abbreviated training doesn't really fit in very well with.

That said, people who don't gain well on normal programs usually don't gain well on any program. If they're not going to gain anything anyway, they might as well spend as little time at the gym as possible. (At one time I said this as a lame joke but now I'm in the stage where it's like wait, that might actually be right!)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 02-03-2018, 08:09 AM
InsertCleverNameHere InsertCleverNameHere is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 325
Default

Is OP talking about the 90s or today?

It seems to me that there have always been the mainstream recommendations from the magazines like hitting every angle of the muscle, muscle confusion, supplements, etc. and more niche type approaches. Today, I guess what's popular is represented by Youtube and BB.com. When I was growing up, Stuart McRobert and the guys advocating HIT were a sane minority advocating sensible training. These days the sane people seem to be calling themselves "evidence-based."

Overall, it seems like everybody is in love with volume these days. Both the BB.com people and the evidence based people seem to be saying that volume is key (even though they might have different interpretations).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 02-03-2018, 08:57 AM
zLeeKo's Avatar
zLeeKo zLeeKo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 753
Default

By definition being a hardgainer doesn't mean you can't put on FFM, it means it's harder to do so (i.e. requires more volume).

So hard hainers = more volume and more food?

Well, the argument would be that perhaps a different training program might be better for the slender folks.

What's interesting is that there have been two opposing approahces suggested.

The Hardgainer (aka the magazine) philosophy is lower volume and higher intensity focusing on increasing weight on big movements.

Others have argued for higher frequency and modulated intensity due to generally lowered recovery in the typical HG guy.

The Hardgainer approach always came from the stance that drug fuelled super high volume bodybuilding was the ruin of the natural. And went to the other extreme. But there is a happy medium. The HG camp got stupider and stupider with extreme low volume and frequency.

So how should you train?

2-way split. 4 workouts per week. 3-7 sets per body part (depending on which body part and individual training tolerance). Stop most sets 1 rep before failure. (i.e. GBR).

It's a great set up and is what (most) people at intermediate level should be doing to add mass (except me, I'm delicate little flower).
__________________
"He never had the makings of a varsity athlete"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 02-05-2018, 05:22 PM
nsteel nsteel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 63
Default

Surely you're better off doing a Mon, Wed, Fri regimen?
You only grow when you're recovering on off days.

Consider this. If I use a heavy weight and go to complete failure on 1 set, surely any additional sets thereafter will be needlessly thrashed already recruited motor units?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.