BodyRecomposition Support Forums  

Go Back   BodyRecomposition Support Forums > General information > General diet questions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 03-13-2017, 12:56 PM
Scraff Scraff is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2
Default De novo lipogenesis

I would read frequently on nutrition forums that de novo lipogenesis rarely happens and only in extreme conditions. Is the overall view on that changing? I've been running into more articles recently that suggests it seems to be.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832395/

http://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/endo/50396
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 03-13-2017, 03:49 PM
BigPecsPeter BigPecsPeter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,063
Default

It's not important. Don't worry about it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 03-13-2017, 05:56 PM
lylemcdonald lylemcdonald is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 837
Default

Eat moronic amounts of fructose (usually in the form of sugary soda and people who do this always have a staggeringly bad diet and lifestyle and what do you think is the real problem here) in the liver and it can happen.

Solution: don't eat moronic amounts of fructose/a totally crap diet with inactivity that makes you get fat as hell because your entire lifestyle sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 03-13-2017, 06:06 PM
Scraff Scraff is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lylemcdonald View Post
Eat moronic amounts of fructose (usually in the form of sugary soda and people who do this always have a staggeringly bad diet and lifestyle and what do you think is the real problem here) in the liver and it can happen.

Solution: don't eat moronic amounts of fructose/a totally crap diet with inactivity that makes you get fat as hell because your entire lifestyle sucks.
I'm not looking for an excuse to eat a crappy diet. I'm trying to get the straight dope on how rare de novo lipogenesis is.

Something you've said in the past:

Quote:
Unless you’re deliberately overfeeding carbs for many days in a row (along with an extremely low-fat intake), DNL generally contributes minimally, if at all to fat gain (for review, see Hellerstein, 1999).
From the following study:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991323/


... fructose can rapidly and without any control produce glucose, glycogen, lactate, and pyruvate, providing both the glycerol and acyl portion of acyl-glycerol molecules. These particular substrates and the lack of regulation of this pathway could result in large amounts of TG that can be packed into very-low density lipoproteins by the liver. ...The investigators demonstrated that post meal lipogenesis increased in proportion to fructose concentration in a beverage: from 7.8% for 100g glucose beverage to 15.9% after a mixture of 50g glucose: 50g fructose and 16.9% after a mixture of 25g glucose: 75g fructose beverage. Body fat synthesis was measured immediately after the sweet drinks were consumed. This study concluded that fructose has an immediate acute lipogenic effect; with greater serum TG level in the morning, and after a subsequent meal, even if consumed as a small amount in a mixture of sugars. ...

There was a 7.8% icrease in post meal lipogenesisfor after a 100g glucose beverage. That's about two and a half cans of coke or a coke and a slice of pie.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 03-14-2017, 06:05 AM
BigPecsPeter BigPecsPeter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,063
Default

Did you even READ the full paper?

"Moreover, in a recent meta-analysis, no significant effect of fructose consumption could be demonstrated on body weight with doses ≤ 100g/day in adults [40]."

I.e., and in non academic language, it's really NOT IMPORTANT.

Quote:
There was a 7.8% icrease in post meal lipogenesisfor after a 100g glucose beverage. That's about two and a half cans of coke or a coke and a slice of pie
Have you done mathematics before? If so, please go back to your Grade 4 book and note the carefully worded phrase:

"In the context of post meal lipogenesis, a 7.8% increase is virtually nothing."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 03-14-2017, 08:58 AM
lylemcdonald lylemcdonald is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPecsPeter View Post
Did you even READ the full paper?

"Moreover, in a recent meta-analysis, no significant effect of fructose consumption could be demonstrated on body weight with doses ≤ 100g/day in adults [40]."

I.e., and in non academic language, it's really NOT IMPORTANT.


Have you done mathematics before? If so, please go back to your Grade 4 book and note the carefully worded phrase:

"In the context of post meal lipogenesis, a 7.8% increase is virtually nothing."
It sounds like a huge amount but when you look at absolute numbers it equates to nothing.

And once again, it's simply when peope consume moronic amounts of fructose. You see this in people drinking lots of regula soda. Who always have a staggeringly bad overall lifestyle.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 03-14-2017, 08:59 AM
lylemcdonald lylemcdonald is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scraff View Post
I'm not looking for an excuse to eat a crappy diet. I'm trying to get the straight dope on how rare de novo lipogenesis is.

Something you've said in the past:



From the following study:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991323/


... fructose can rapidly and without any control produce glucose, glycogen, lactate, and pyruvate, providing both the glycerol and acyl portion of acyl-glycerol molecules. These particular substrates and the lack of regulation of this pathway could result in large amounts of TG that can be packed into very-low density lipoproteins by the liver. ...The investigators demonstrated that post meal lipogenesis increased in proportion to fructose concentration in a beverage: from 7.8% for 100g glucose beverage to 15.9% after a mixture of 50g glucose: 50g fructose and 16.9% after a mixture of 25g glucose: 75g fructose beverage. Body fat synthesis was measured immediately after the sweet drinks were consumed. This study concluded that fructose has an immediate acute lipogenic effect; with greater serum TG level in the morning, and after a subsequent meal, even if consumed as a small amount in a mixture of sugars. ...

There was a 7.8% icrease in post meal lipogenesisfor after a 100g glucose beverage. That's about two and a half cans of coke or a coke and a slice of pie.
So don't eat 2 cans of coke and a slice of pie for god's sake. How hard is this?

That's a crap meal and a crap diet and QUANTITATIVELY the amount of fat made is miniscule compared to the TOTAL AMOUNT OF FAT IN THE SLICE OF FREAKING PIE.

Yeah, fine you make a couple of grams of fat from the fructose.
And ate 30 grams of fat in the pie

Which matters more?

THE PIE

Basically the word you're missing here is QUANTIATIVELY sgnificant. Does DNL happen? Sure. But is it relevant in a world where people are eating 100+ grams of fat per day. No, no it is not.

Because say you drink 2 cans soda and the eat the pie. And DNL is 7.8% or whaterver
Eat the identical amount of fpure fat and you know how much fat is mades/tored: 97%

what matters more?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 03-27-2017, 08:51 AM
tyler163 tyler163 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 30
Default

http://m.ajcn.nutrition.org/content/48/2/240.short

150 gr fat gain every 450 gr cho x day ingested after glycogen repletion..i don t read the paper only abstract but quantitavely irrelevant...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 03-27-2017, 11:05 AM
BigPecsPeter BigPecsPeter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler163 View Post
http://m.ajcn.nutrition.org/content/48/2/240.short

150 gr fat gain every 450 gr cho x day ingested after glycogen repletion..i don t read the paper only abstract but quantitavely irrelevant...
And this is relevant to the thread because of...??

You just linked to an old study that demonstrates that DNL happens with MASSIVE carb overfeeding. In this study the participants were so overfed that on the final day they averaged an intake of around 5000kcal
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 03-28-2017, 02:29 AM
tyler163 tyler163 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 30
Default

Because of...someone answer that the novo lipogenesis is irrilrvant while the study (yes an old study...but a study...or only we can trust in new study?) says you could gain 150 gr of fat eating 450 gr of carbo...the same can occur eating 160 gr of fat. So the question of the thread if it is relevant...i think yes Because 450 gr of carbo is not a "extreme" amount neither 150 gr of fat gain is an irrilevan amount. That is my idea...who ask the question could see the 2 opinion and decide...if he prefear to gain 100 gr of fat eating 500 gr of white rice or gain the same amount eating 300 gr of fat cheese. Is like my question about caffeine and lypolisis..for you and squat is irrilevant. .for me and other people on earth it could be relevant.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.