BodyRecomposition Support Forums  

Go Back   BodyRecomposition Support Forums > General information > General diet questions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Unread 02-27-2010, 10:30 AM
healthy heather's Avatar
healthy heather healthy heather is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3
Default Bot?

what is a BOT? and what does "sticky" mean in regards to a thread?

sorry Im new here
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 02-27-2010, 05:06 PM
PlankIt PlankIt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by healthy heather View Post
what is a BOT? and what does "sticky" mean in regards to a thread?

sorry Im new here
BOT - something set up to spam forums
sticky - a thread that is "stuck" at the top of the forum sections; where Lyle addresses frequently asked questions
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 11-16-2010, 02:51 AM
tayjeremy tayjeremy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 600
Default

Hahaha I was just reading the fruits and sugars table and saw the final comment.

It should have been

Bot: You.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread 11-16-2010, 12:56 PM
Gaspard Winckler Gaspard Winckler is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 22
Default

This is useful.

Taking the health recommendation to get 400-500g of fruit or vegetables, let's say it all came from the most fructos-y (fructosesque?) fruits, that would be about max 15g X 5 = 75g carbs and max 8 X 5 = 40g fructose, which is not much.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Unread 11-16-2010, 06:45 PM
tayjeremy tayjeremy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 600
Default

http://weightology.net/?p=434
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Unread 11-25-2010, 11:01 PM
LarryR LarryR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by misstenacity View Post
Sorry if someone else already found this, but I was 'oogling for the fructose in my grapes this morning and found a fantastic table:

Fruits and their Sugars (from the paleo diet website, via nutrition software)

Enjoy!
Funny how HFCS (55%) has less fructose than table sugar!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Unread 11-26-2010, 03:32 PM
sven_a sven_a is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 45
Default

I don't get why people fret so much over the fructose content of fruit. If you're in a deficit, fruit won't make you fat. If you're not in a deficit, you'll gain weight any way you look at it. If some of the weight gain comes from fruit, what does it matter?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Unread 02-09-2011, 11:34 AM
Kilian Kilian is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sven_a View Post
I don't get why people fret so much over the fructose content of fruit. If you're in a deficit, fruit won't make you fat. If you're not in a deficit, you'll gain weight any way you look at it. If some of the weight gain comes from fruit, what does it matter?
It matters in the context of refeeds because fructose will mainly go to refilling liver glycogen as opposed to skeletal muscle.

That list is great, however it doesn't have Plantains!
Does anybody know the carb content/ratios of Plantains (not bananas)?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Unread 02-26-2011, 08:56 PM
quenca333's Avatar
quenca333 quenca333 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 56
Default

I dont undestand the fructose fear... even the very HIGH fructose fear...

Why should I, considering that even if the fructose will turn to fat when eating, so what, we dont get this way when eating fat...

its always about calories, so... ?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Unread 03-01-2011, 06:21 AM
quenca333's Avatar
quenca333 quenca333 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Calories are NOT calories. You can gain fat while being on an under maintenance caloric level by simply having your macro nutrient profiles screwed up. I read a very well conducted study recently where they took over 1500 people and put them on a diet that was 1000 calories below maintenance levels and the primary macro-nutrient was fructose. The vast majority of the people actually GAINED bodyfat while eating 1000 calories less than maintenance levels. The scale weight went down, and when they tested body composition they determined the people had lost a lot of muscle while actually storing more bodyfat. Without going into diet details as this is not what this article is for, the simple take home message is carbs are not your friend on a fat loss diet. That is not conjecture, just basic physiology.

At iron addicts forum


Is this possible?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.