![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Thanks |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() fat normals - same day, same machine, same operator +- 1kg lean, +- 0.6kg fat
drinking beforehand a gain in lean eating before hand can also reduce your BMD excellent as an example Blue is the difference between two repeat measures for total mass Pink is the difference between two repeat measures for fat mass Yellow is the difference between two repeat measures for lean mass 1 - 8 is the subject number The Y axis is the difference in kilograms (1kg = 2.2lbs) ![]() Last edited by cycomiko : 08-31-2009 at 08:28 PM. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() interesting......thank you
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wonder how the first link can even be considered. You can not measure BF based on the waist size alone.
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]() And yet it shows decent correlation with other measures.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I dunno depends on who you ask. For me it gives me 15% BF as I carry weight around my waist. Multi-site calipers give me 11-12%, so I would agree that it is very close.
Multi-site calipers for my wife give her 25-28%. The waist measurment gives her 17%. There is no way she is 17%. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() i've found this to be a fairly accurate tape measure method (at least in correlation to calipers, and when i was cat 3 to lyle's bmi correlation)
http://www.healthcentral.com/cholest...-2774-143.html |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The second link said that I was 6.42% BF. I don't think so.
![]() Does anyone have a recommendation on a descent set of calipers. I was looking at the Accu-Measure Fat Track II Digital Body Fat Caliper. Any feedback on these?
__________________
"Work and you will be strong, sit and you will stink" - Morrocan |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() slim guides from creative health. stay away from anything "accu-measure"
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|