![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm sure many of you are familiar with the whole g-flux concept that berardi writes about. Questions: Is this theory valid? Would there be any value what so ever in raising calorie intake and overall exercise volume for a period of time prior to actually cutting calories? Basically get your metabolism screaming then diet down to your original maintenance? Thanks
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
End of the day its still a caloric deficit, nothing revolutionary.
__________________
http://bodyblitzz.com |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
From a physiological standpoint, see Lyle's answer.
Psychologically, if I could subtract a few hundred calories, or if I could ride my bike for an hour and keep eating the same, I'd rather do the latter. People make the whole concept a lot more complicated than it needs to be trying to schedule a ridiculous workload and time the intake of every calorie to match it. Look at it as raising your maintenance through activity. That's what I do by riding my bike 60 mins 3-4x/wk (on top of my weight training), I just wouldn't eat to offset those extra calories. Bam! I'm dieting. It's just that it's so simple, no one would look at that and call it g-flux. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
the good thing about higher energy intake and expenditure is that you can worry less about the little details of the things you eat. A man eating and burning 3700 calories a day probably wont have to count veggies, seasoning, etc and wont have to worry as much about misweighing anything, compared to a small sedentary woman eating 1300 calories a day where almost every gram counts.
I also think keepiing your fitness level that high would lead to easier weight loss, if you can maintain that ability of energy expenditure |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I g-fluxed Berardi's mom.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why?
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
My reasoning is that if you have a fitness level high enough to burn a considerable amount of caloiries at a given time, say 800 calories an hour as opposed to someone not as fit burning 300 an hour, you'd have an easier time with creating a caloric deficit.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
realistically speaking, people who need/wants it usually don't have the luxury to move about that much.
Its easier and more feasible to reduce their intake.
__________________
http://bodyblitzz.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|